Search for: "Head v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 13,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 10:44 am
Little more  than a year after it decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:41 am by Lyle Denniston
  That ruling, in the case of Stuart v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:43 am
Every day, the Sunshine State's roads and highways are full of drivers headed to and from work. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 4:47 am by Donald Dinnie
Dube Tradeport Corporation v SMEC South Africa Proprietary Limited (17213/2022P) [2024] ZAKZPHC 111 (26 November 2024) [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:40 am by Jason Mazzone
Its careful, balanced, cool-headed discussion makes it the best thing written so far on the complex legal and political issues. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Fink then crossed over the center line of Route V and struck Midkiff's vehicle head-on. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am by Steve Kalar
 Brave case of first impression brings intellectually-rigorous analysis to – challenging – sentencing fact pattern.United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Cert Petition Question presented: Whether the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, a statute of general application, impliedly repealed other federal statutes that specifically subject Indian tribes to state restrictions on gaming, a question that has divided the courts of appeals. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
I’m delighted to say that the Nebraska Supreme Court has just agreed to review State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:29 pm by Daily Record Staff
On September 24, 2012, when Reggie was four years old, Ward struck Reggie repeatedly with a belt or cord on the child’s head, ears and back. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:52 pm by Rich Vetstein
Jacob Realty Agents Required To Adhere to Dress Code, Mandatory Office Hours The Appeals Court will consider the case of Monell, et al. v. [read post]