Search for: "Head v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 3:04 pm
In May of 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan heard a case involving a car accident and a woman who claimed that she sustained a closed head injury. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:37 pm
The granted issue in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:45 am
United States, 341 U.S. 494, 589 (1951) (Douglas, J., dissenting). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
Jeff: [question mark hovers over head]. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Posner's use of the word "head" instead of "heads" in the following passage from that court's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:30 am
, Minneapolis-based US Bank is headed for trial in United States District Court in Texas (E.D. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
United States, otherwise known as the “Pentagon Papers” case, from 1971. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
United States is an apparently contradictory interpretation of two different parts of the APA that brings joy to my student-confusing, puzzle-loving, Leg-Reg teaching side but leaves me scratching my head on how Judge Smith got the Fifth Circuit to go along. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:11 am
Recently, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a 2010 ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court, did not have the constitutional authority to decide a state law claim brought by a debtor against a creditor, even though the matter was part of the “core” statutory jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
Updating this Dec. 27, 2006 ILB entry, headed "Lilly wins major Zyprexa patent case," (and including a link to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 23-page opinion in the case of Eli Lilly v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:19 am
DOJ resisted in McCane, but filed its own from United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 8:49 pm
Zirnsak v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:32 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
As a result, the United States refused to pay KBR, and KBR refused to pay Tamimi. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:01 pm
United Magazine v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
The suggestion was made that Marlena travel to the United States to visit with her family and "clear her head. [read post]
