Search for: "Held v. Kaufman"
Results 181 - 200
of 218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 3:26 am
The Haber defendants' submission of documentary evidence did not conclusively establish a defense to the claims asserted by the plaintiff (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; see generally Held v Kaufman, 91 NY2d 425, 430-431; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88; Peter F. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:04 pm
Allgood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540 US 1162 )." [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
" The Court noted: "Since the law favors the free and unobstructed use of real property, a restrictive covenant must be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce it, and may not be given an interpretation extending beyond the clear meaning of its terms (see Witter v Taggart, 78 NY2d 234, 237-238; Wechsler v Gasparrini, 40 AD3d 976; Liebowitz v Forman, 22 AD3d 530, 531; Kaufman v Fass, 302 AD2d 497, 498, cert denied 540 US 1162 ). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:00 pm
MacAngus v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:28 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
In Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 11:29 am
Islamic Society of Arlington Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
Kaufman and Broad Home Corp. (2001) 89 Cal.Ap.4th 908. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 8:54 pm
Kaufman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Co., 246 AD2d 524, 525; Dube v Kaufman, 145 AD2d 595, 596). [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:37 pm
' So, before the sunwas down, we had the rule that is now Rule 10b-5.Today the W$J Blog is reporting that Senators Arlen Specter, Jack Reed, and Edward Kaufman are sponsoring a bill to upend the Supreme Court's 2007 opinion in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Okor v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
By Tom Kaufman: Arias v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:11 am
One of the cases De La Cruz cited was Kaufman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:34 am
Thomas facility was not included under the definition of working capital (see Held v Kaufman, 91 NY2d 425, 431-432 [1998]). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
Kaufman & Broad Home Corp. (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 908, 914; accord, Aguiar v. [read post]
