Search for: "Held v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 181 - 200
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
She writes: Section 1401 can still be read literally because the section that authorizes the federal exchanges, Section 1321, provides that if a state does not establish an exchange under Section 1311, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “shall . . . establish and operate such Exchange within the State. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:40 am
The Principal Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Dept, Govt. of NCT of Delhi). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm
Austria, Wingrove v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
See IMS Health, 616 F.3d at 14. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization—which held that the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
(Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, whose agency is at the heart of carrying out the law, sat through all three days of arguments in 2012, but she isn’t here today.) [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
That reading is, not surprisingly, inconsistent with how everyone in the legislative process, in both political branches, understood what they had done.Third, and as I’ve explained twice before, Judge O’Connor’s reading would render tens or hundreds of thousands (perhaps now millions) of people to be lawbreakers, even though that was manifestly not Congress's intent or design, in either 2010 or 2017.For starters, consider (i) members of Indian… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Gennady V. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued a report detailing the administrative hurdles CMS might face when implementing the Part B provisions. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:16 am
A claimant who suffers a covered injury seeks relief by filing a petition with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (currently the petitioner, Kathleen Sebelius). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
’” APHA v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:52 am
’” APHA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
” Fanning v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
The claim of impact on mental health. b. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
Nicklin J held that tweets by actor Laurence Fox were defamatory allegations of fact. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
