Search for: "Herring v. Reid" Results 181 - 200 of 328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Elijah Yip
Discovery of Social Media Content Relevant to “Mental State” — Reid v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid reports that he has been confronted with some 386 GOP-lead filibusters in the past six years. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am by Frank Pasquale
The controversy reminded me of an article on “Libel by Implication,” and a decade-old defamation case, Howard v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm by Eric
If you haven't seen it and you teach in the IP/Internet/Advertising Law areas, email her for the login credentials. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
 Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Legal Beagle
The Court interlocutor, which is a public document, can be viewed and downloaded here : Interlocutor Elish Angiolini v Robert Green re Hollie Greig case While the former Lord Advocate is being represented by Balfour & Manson, she has curiously given her home address in the documents as the Glasgow law firm of LEVY MCRAE who number among their other clients, shamed former Glasgow City Council Boss & Cocaine addict Steven Purcell. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm by Todd Ruger
" Neither Grassley nor Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) immediately returned requests for comment. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Nicola Brookes, 45, from Brighton, has obtained a Norwich Pharmacal Order to compel Facebook to supply details of online users who set up a fake Facebook profile in her name, according to her solicitors Bains Cohen. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:52 am by Andrew Ramonas
But three justices had one more case to hear in Washington on Monday night: Claudio v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"Where, as here, a defendant moves to vacate a judgment entered upon his or her default in appearing or answering the complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction, the defendant is not required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious defense (see Harkless v Reid, 23 AD3d 622, 622-623; Steele v Hempstead Pub Taxi, 305 AD2d 401, 402). [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
The April edition of Legal Action brings news that Hurst v UK has settled. [read post]