Search for: "Herring v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 21,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2012, 10:40 am by William Young, Jr.
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear oral arguments on Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:01 pm
Ford v D.C. 37 Union Local 1549, CA2d Circuit, Docket No. 08-2317-cv Roxanne Ford appealed a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New dismissing her complaint alleging that DC-37 breached the duty of fair... [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:50 am
"After Words with Roberta Kaplan: Roberta Kaplan talked about her book Then Comes Marriage: United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Jamison Koehler
United States, ___ A.3d ___ (D.C. 2014), the trial court admitted into evidence the prior consistent statement by the complaining witness that the defendant had hit her several times in the face, as charged, and that he had threatened to kill her. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
” But if states do not have the power to regulate directly, then, as Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
Read her entire entry here, on SCOTUSwiki. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
United States as a big step towards repealing the exclusionary rule the Court crafted in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]