Search for: "High v State" Results 181 - 200 of 35,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:35 am by Tessa Shepperson
New data shows tenants’ income v rent Canopy, a landlord & tenant services provider, has just released their latest data in their rental affordability index, which states that tenants on average are spending 36% of their take-home pay on rent, with 11% spending over 60% on rent, and 4.4% over 80%. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm by Macy Berryman
Prior to the 2021 decision in Google v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm by centerforartlaw
Those seeking a more immersive experience could opt for the $500 “High Tea for Two. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Even more important for Wirt was the current American state of mind, a so [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It is justified in response to decisions like Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am by Paolo Busco
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As for implementing the SAAR+ proposal, it envisions a model state statute, but state contracting statutes pose an obvious challenge: They only work if the parties’ actions are controlled by a jurisdiction where such a statute is enacted. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Churchill IV’s stock price continued to climb, closing on February 18, 2021, at an all-time high of over $58 per share. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:13 pm by adachel@foley.com
The Proposed Rule seeks to protect employees from hazards associated with high heat in the workplace and would apply to both indoor and outdoor work settings. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
At the same time, the Appellate Division usually defers to the judgments of the SDHR when that agency does find discrimination.The case is In the Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]