Search for: "High v. Parker" Results 181 - 200 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When Legg got pregnant, she requested light duty because it was a high-risk pregnancy. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 Others now suing include EastEnders actors Christopher Parker and Brooke Kinsella, Coronation Street actor Kym Marsh, designer Pearl Lowe and her musician husband Danny Goffey and actor and comedian Les Dennis. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm by Walter Olson
Hans Bader of CEI, at Law and Liberty: As the Washington state supreme court noted in Rickert v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
Neither the driver nor the passenger attempted to get gas, and approximately 2–3 minutes later, the Nissan Armada departed the scene in an erratic behavior and at a high rate of speed. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Nigeria A Benin High Court ruled in favour of Punch Nigeria Limited, in a N20 billion libel suit. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Children's National Medical Center, 121 A.3d 59, 66 (D.C. 2015) (adopting Restatement §500 “high degree of risk of harm” standard).Florida:  Dyals v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm by Dale Carpenter
But now, as then, the stakes are high for LGBT Houstonians. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
This is despite the high threshold for injurious falsehood claims, requiring a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements; a false statement about the plaintiff’s goods or business (falsity); publication of the statement by the defendant to a third party; malice; and actual damage (Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [52]). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The court was also keen to stress the fact that there was a commercial rationale for the charge owing to the clear benefits (to both consumers and retail businesses) of ensuring a relatively high turnover of visitors to the facilities which therefore justified deterring parkers from overstaying. [read post]