Search for: "Hill v. District Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
See Blair v. [read post]
Fed. Dist. Court of PA Grants Church’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction on RLUIPA Equal Terms Claim
22 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
Hope Rising Community Church v Municipality of Penn Hills, 2015 WL 7720380 (WD PA 10/28/2015) Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:54 am
B0595NOHW46387019 v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
So you might want to take notice of a little bit of direction in today's Order from the Business Court in Hill v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:01 pm
There are two unpublished District Court decisions that we've seen: Salazar v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
Connor, it appeared, on this record, it was justified enough to support the district court's conclusion. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:05 am
In Whitaker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. district court, concerned overtime wages. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:48 am
Parmalat Capital Finance Limited v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
Lioness Vizions, LLC et al v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
A South Carolina federal district court on Tuesday denied a preliminary injunction in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
District Court Judge Michael J. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
Third, the district court did not coerce the jury verdict but properly exercised its discretion in investigating and responding to alleged juror misconduct.So after careful consideration, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm Hill’s conviction. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:39 am
Gianakas v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:10 am
In Sarsour v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
Lemy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
"Reasonableness review" under the abuse of discretion standard is a steep hill to climb for a sentence vacation and remand.Musladin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Facts: This case (Crane Co. v. [read post]
