Search for: "Hines v. May"
Results 181 - 200
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Hines v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
Hines, 883 So.2d 292, 294 (Fla. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
Finally, addressing the district court’s reliance on Hines v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
London Borough of Haringey v Hines [2010] EWCA Civ 1111 Ms Hines had purchased a property under the right to buy from Haringey in 2002. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm
However, the Ninth Circuit in agreeing with the Eleventh and Fourth Circuits’ rulings in Hines v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:18 am
As for Judge Bolton’s reasoning in her order invalidating key provisions of the law, it is striking how much work Hines v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
The key precedent Judge Bolton relies on — and thus the place to start if you want to know more — is Hines v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
t of Consumer Affairs v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:07 pm
Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm
Judge Richard Posner used similar logic when penning the 7th Circuit’s 2001 decision in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Thanks to Professor Laura Hines (Kansas) for the following case update:The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in the Dukes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:53 pm
V. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
Lead Finnegan lawyer Dori Hines said her team was able to successfully argue that the patent BarTex was asserting covered only a single bar code. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Nat'l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363, 373 (2000) (quoting Hines v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
Hines, 506 F.3d 1249, 1274 (10th Cir. 2007). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:19 am
The case is Hines v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
