Search for: "Howard v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 181 - 200
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2008, 2:37 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
There have been a presidential election, a change in control of the United States Senate, two bizarre and seemingly endless party primaries, and the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Harrison, a cert petition involving the procedures used to serve process in the United States on a foreign nation, on which the court has asked the federal government to weigh in. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Today the court hears oral argument in two cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
United States (consolidated with two other cases), which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
"The case is 13-cv-05693, Flo & Eddie Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
At the Fed Soc Blog, James Burnham discusses United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:34 am
United States, supra. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 9:24 am
Two possible mechanisms exist to create a test case. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has the story of two men who were married in 1975 and then brought “the first case asking a federal court to recognize a same-sex marriage” — in which the “judge who wrote the final word on whether [the pair] could stay together in the United States or be forced to strike out in search of a country that would take them was Anthony M. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
Many readers will know that these two cases concerned the federal enforcement of the Bill of Rights, not the Article IV. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
But then Howard went on to state, "This case, for whatever reason, has not been worked up in a reasonable fashion. . . . [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Other coverage and commentary focus on yesterday’s orders, in which the Court granted four new cases, issued two per curiam opinions, and denied some noteworthy cases. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman and How Appealing for the link.) [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
As in “other disputes between two United States based parties which involve criticism, panels have recognized that First Amendment protections can give rise to a claim of fair use on the respondent’s part,” citing among other decisions Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Yesterday the Court returned from a two-week recess to issue six opinions in argued cases. [read post]
