Search for: "Howe v. People" Results 181 - 200 of 34,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am by Dylan Gibbs
How can a defendant refuse to turn over security footage that captures the dispute on tape? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Ezra Rosser
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The ruling by County Judge Thomas Sponaugle in Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) V. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am by Jocelyn Bosse
" They give particular attention to patents and access and benefit sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity to demonstrate how these laws operate to exclude Indigenous peoples' own ontologies and customary laws, and how the law:[treats] Indigenous people's knowledge as mere information that only comes to be legitimate knowledge when it is used to benefit the ends of corporations or institutions; or else by assuming that… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
However, she indicated, “It may be necessary in another case to investigate the precise ambit of the Code of Practice and the Statutory Guidance (and the Rules) and how they interact but that is not warranted here” [14]. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Each of these three episodes highlights how underexplained the Court’s Trump v Anderson decision last month was. [read post]