Search for: "Human Rights Division" Results 181 - 200 of 5,915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that a New York State public employer met its prima facie burden of showing that there were no triable issues of fact that would support plaintiff's petition alleging age discrimination within the meaning of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296[1][a]), as there was no indication that the employer's… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that a New York State public employer met its prima facie burden of showing that there were no triable issues of fact that would support plaintiff's petition alleging age discrimination within the meaning of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §8-107[1][a]) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296[1][a]), as there was no indication that the employer's… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 1:52 pm by Courtney Erwin
My own conversations with Moroccan friends and colleagues have exhibited the divisive nature of this debate, which seems to follow in the path of the PJD and CNDH in pitting human rights against religion. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:57 am by John Jascob
Caterpillar argued that it had addressed the proposal’s “essential objectives” because a board committee is expected in the near future to review company policies related to human rights and consider whether amendments are necessary. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:50 am by Robert Tanha
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews important decisions from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.PROCEDURAL RULINGSJasavala v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm by Sam Murrant
programme exploring the rather divisive issues that Human Rights bring up for the British public. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you handle employment discrimination cases in New York City, you know that the New York City Human Rights Law extends far greater protections to employees than Title VII or the New York State Human Rights Law. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:25 am by sally
“Criticised by many Tories, defended by the Liberal Democrats, the Human Rights Act is highly divisive within the coalition. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have zero tolerance for symbols of racism or division, and I have directed the New York State Division of Human Rights to investigate the incident immediately. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have zero tolerance for symbols of racism or division, and I have directed the New York State Division of Human Rights to investigate the incident immediately. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that "The scope of judicial review under the Human Rights Law is extremely narrow and is confined to the consideration of whether the determination of the SDHR is supported by substantial evidence** in the record," citing Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v Roadtec, Inc., 167 AD3d 898. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that "The scope of judicial review under the Human Rights Law is extremely narrow and is confined to the consideration of whether the determination of the SDHR is supported by substantial evidence** in the record," citing Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v Roadtec, Inc., 167 AD3d 898. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
From an Institutional Review Board (IRB) Tutorial for Human Subjects Research:THE ABILITY TO CONDUCT HUMAN RESEARCH IS A PRIVILEGE; IT IS NOT A RIGHT"There is no substantive due process right to conduct human subject research" Federal District Court, Fourth Division, 1996The formal codification of ethical guidelines for the conduct of research involving humans began in the late 1940's.In 1946, 23 Nazi physicians went on… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:15 am
Highlighting both consensus and divisions in the international jurisprudence in this area, this book provides an invaluable resource to practitioners and scholars dealing with breaches of one of the most fundamental human rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Panghat v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2011 NY Slip Op 08475, Appellate Division, First Department Lijo Panghat, alleging that he had suffered defamation as the result of the New York State Division of Human Rights’ having published... [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:24 am
  -->Jernej Letnar Cernic jernej.letnar@gmail.com Constitutional Obligations of Corporations in Europe Developments in business and human rights in the past decade reveal a division between voluntary and binding approaches to the questions of whether corporations have human rights obligations and whether they should be held accountable for their human rights impacts. [read post]