Search for: "Hurt v State" Results 181 - 200 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 11:44 am by Virginia Hunt
Do not be pressured into not filing a claim if you are hurt on the job. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:42 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Boyer in the Venango County Court of Common Pleas case of Heller v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm by Rick Hasen
The state of Washington just won summary judgment on remand in the Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:49 am
  Nevertheless, employers (and especially out-of-state employers) persist in including them in employment contracts under the theory that "it can't hurt" to have them as a deterrent and a potential source of leverage. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Igor Nikolic
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]