Search for: "I.C." Results 181 - 200 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2009, 3:12 am
App. 2003), the majority determined the use of the word "might" in I.C. 31-14-14-1 means the court can't restrict visitation unless it would endanger the child's physical health or well-being.While The Indiana Lawyer emphasized the parenting time/visitation issue, the case also involves the change of custody from mother to father. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:22 am by Derk Visser
However, the latest edition of the book Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 9th edition, published July 2019, still mentions the three criteria of the test (see chapter I.C.6.3.1). [read post]
.: 2) Option 1: The parties provide for two “separate” arrangements for data transfers under the FADP and under the GDPR Option 2: The parties adopt the GDPR standard for all data transfers Competent supervisory authority in Annex I.C under Clause 13 Mandatory FDPIC Parallel supervision: FDPIC, insofar as the data transfer is governed by the FADP; EU authority insofar as the data transfer is governed by the GDPR (the criteria of Clause 13a for the selection of the competent… [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:52 pm by Burton A. Padove
When the pizza shop employer appealed, it argued that  I.C. 22-3-3-12, the Indiana Apportionment Statute, acts to separate workplace injuries from pre-existing disabilities or impairments that might or might not be related. [read post]
The IURC found the ordinances to be unreasonable and void under I.C. 8-1-2-101, specifically because they both conflicted with INDOT regulations, contained vague or undefined terms, and served to impermissibly shift relocation costs onto Duke’s customers outside of Carmel. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
Consequently, when South Haven petitioned the Commission for an expanded CTA without having acquired EPA's approval, it did so without the lawful power and authority to provide services as required by I.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by David Vasella
Jedenfalls aber käme eine Anerkennungsvereinbarung nur dann überhaupt in Frage, wenn die strafbare Handlung für das Urteil nachweislich kausal war: Il n'y a pas lieu de décider, d'une façon générale, si l'ordre public matériel suisse s'oppose à la reconnaissance d'une décision étrangère qui repose sur une telle infraction (i.c. un faux témoignage), du moins lorsqu'il… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:25 pm by Michael Smith
The Indiana Business Flexibility Act creates two distinct categories of LLC rights:  (1) interest, or “a member’s economic rights in the limited liability company, including the member’s share of the profits and losses of the limited liability company and the right to receive distributions from the limited liability company,” I.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 9:26 am
This Court erred in applying the procedural requirements of AOPA, in particular, I.C. 4-21.5-5-10, to this case. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:52 pm by Burton A. Padove
When the pizza shop employer appealed, it argued that  I.C. 22-3-3-12, the Indiana Apportionment Statute, acts to separate workplace injuries from pre-existing disabilities or impairments that might or might not be related. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:41 am
Appellant maintains that, pursuant to a liberal interpretation favoring the employee of I.C. 22-3-3-13(h), his receipt of Social Security benefits should be added to disability payments from his employer for purposes of exhausting the maximum worker's compensation disability benefits, thus, entitling him to benefits from the Fund. [read post]
The court began by noting while I.C. 34-24-1-8 does not explicitly require objections in condemnation proceedings to state specific supporting facts, Indiana precedent has long established that such facts must be included, observed by the Indiana Supreme Court’s 1947 holding in Joint Cnty. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 8:18 am by Burton A. Padove
(The statute of limitations on Indiana personal injury lawsuits is two years, per I.C. 34-11-2-4(1).) [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
I've just finished up a draft of this article; you can read the PDF, but here's an excerpt from the Introduction: For many litigants these days, one of the most important questions is: Can I keep my name, and its connection to the case and its facts, off the Internet? [read post]