Search for: "IN RE: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct v." Results 181 - 200 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
Allen had been or was still being investigated for sexual misconduct with minors, [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v… [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
Massa Jr., chief counsel for the state Judicial Conduct Board, which investigates and prosecutes charges of misconduct by judges. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
In re Bird Brain (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are PARK LANE and PARK AVENUE confusingly similar for footwear? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
That excursion into history was important as a fairly efficient means of exposing the fundamental premises of common law and equity, premises that continue to echo in the judicial culture in the United States today, even as the structures of law common law and equity have been increasingly subsumed within a legal culture more at home with statutes, regulations and other means of governance. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s retaliation, due process, and multiple state law claims also survived summary judgment (Bostwick v. [read post]
’s liability policy because the complaint alleged willful and intentional misconduct that does not constitute an “accident. [read post]
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, rather than promoting efficiency and judicial economy, as the Valeant court posits, the forfeiture rule (1) places even greater burdens on investors to identify even more filing deadlines in any given case, including deadlines that are very difficult to determine and for which there is no certainty;  (2) penalizes investors for waiting to file an individual complaint until after a more developed record (e.g., after an order on a motion to dismiss or more facts emerge… [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm by Josh Blackman
As far as I know, misconduct complaints have not been filed against lawyers in private practice and in government, who file such suits. [read post]