Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R"
Results 181 - 188
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
That argument didn't fly in the Johnson case, but a variation on it has been adopted in In re Carver, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 563321 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
That argument didn't fly in the Johnson case, but a variation on it has been adopted in In re Carver, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 563321 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Mar 2006, 11:10 am
In re Kaplan, 331 B.R. 483 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Mar 2006, 11:10 am
In re Kaplan, 331 B.R. 483 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
In re Steingbrecher, 110 B.R. 155 (Bankr. [read post]
20 Feb 2006, 1:33 pm
In In re Montoya, 333 B.R. 449 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:23 pm
Thus, in In re Montoya, 333 B.R. 449 (Bankr. [read post]
