Search for: "IN RE C C BROWN MINOR"
Results 181 - 200
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 3:51 am
 There's one minor housekeeping change allowing for electronic search warrants. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
As far as we're aware, this is the most comprehensive and complete listing of video game cases and lawsuits that we are aware of. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
The upshot of those was that unless and until a possession order was granted, there was very little that could be done as regards re-housing. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:08 am
You need to hang in there until the storm passes -- and until you're sure you're not going to get canned. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Leach , No. 08-2086 Sentence for knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce to attempt to entice a minor into engaging in illegal sexual conduct is affirmed where: 1) government did not breach the plea agreement by asking for a sentence greater than the low end of the guidelines range as the government did not make a definite oral promise to ask for a low-end sentence; and 2) defendant was not released of his obligation under the plea agreement not to advocate for a sentence below… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Code section 288a(b)(1), under which Defendant was previously convicted for oral copulation of a minor, prohibited conduct that would not be criminalized under the generic meaning of sexual abuse of a minor, and thus was not a "crime of violence. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:23 pm
Brown J. in the recent decision of Re Henderson, 2008 CanLII 69136 addresses the issue, and highlights the evidence required by the court when determining whether a bond is to be dispensed with. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Whorley, No. 06-4288 Convictions for receipt of obscene cartoons depicting minors, receipt of actual child pornography, and receipt of obscene e-mails are unsuccessfully challenged on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 3:26 am
While it may be easier to spend more hours in Bank A., those hours must be cut in Bank B or Bank C. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Page 2 alleged that defendants-appellees James C. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, October 14, 2008 Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 22, 2008 Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) M.W., a Minor v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Williams, No. 07-1354 The interstate transport of a minor for prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(a) constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of the career offender provision of the Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
Importantly, the Act does not specify that such clinicians must be forensic experts, and suggests a risk assessment may still be made even if the offender does not cooperate fully (or at all) in the examination process.Section 8 outlines what these assessment reports must entail: (a) whether the 'offender has a propensity to commit relevant offences in the future'; (b) their 'pattern and progression' of sexual offending, and the 'nature of any likely future sexual… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Schlesinger, No. 05-3021 Conviction on a variety of arson and fraud charges is affirmed over claim that 28 U.S.C. section 2461(c)(2005) did not authorize the criminal forfeiture of the proceeds of his mail and wire fraud offenses. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
