Search for: "IN RE JOHN B."
Results 181 - 200
of 3,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 3:34 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 May 2024, 3:37 am
"] In re Galaxy Gaming, Inc., Serial No. 97065333 (May 15, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Martha B. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:04 am
[Answer in first comment.]In re B&M Noble Co., Serial No. 86338620 (October 4, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 2:57 pm
The oral argument in the case of John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:04 pm
Rothman, John B. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:26 am
By John W.M. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:48 am
John says that we have to be suspicious of litigation experts because we know that there are two sides to the story, and we're hearing only one of them. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:48 am
That in itself, represents a quite significant assertion of power to frame conversations the ramifications of which remain to b fully appreciated. 2. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
In Oregon, at least on Trimet, speak softly and carry a big message.The case referred to in the Thursday, April 24, 2008, Oregonian story by John Snell:"TriMet: You shout, you're out: New rules - It's not what you say, but how loudly you say it, that will get you booted off the public transit system," can be found at the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) Opinions webpage.The case is: STATE OF OREGON v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:15 pm
"They're reaching a point of diminishing return on their efforts. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
John Yoo? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:15 pm
The moral of the story is simple: if you don't respond properly to a Rule 2.61(b), your cheese may be up a tree.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 9:39 am
A rather different matter, for then BSkyB – the holder of the licence – would be owned by a company untainted by the activities of anyone employed (a) by the company and (b) On the board of directors of the company. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
" See In re Remacle, 66 USPQ2d 1222 (TTAB 2002).Nonetheless, the Board found that the PTO had not met its "heavy burden. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (January 28, 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:55 am
In re Jack B. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78487208 (October 31, 2007) [precedential].Section 1(b)(2) requires that an application "include specification ... of the goods. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:04 am
So for a challenger to "lap" the incumbent, as the Statesman headline writer put it, even an impartial observer (and Grits won't pretend impartiality) would have to conclude that John Bradley appears to be on the ropes, with most of the momentum so far on Jana Duty's side.Still, even if both campaigns meet their fundraising projections, we're not talking about a lot of money given Austin-market TV prices, so much depends on a) how effectively the campaigns… [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:35 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
