Search for: "INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE"
Results 181 - 200
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
. --------------------------------- Part I: The 2014 OVDP On June 18, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS” or “Service”) announced “major changes” to its offshore voluntary compliance programs. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:37 pm
Here, Andyarujina recalls a quarter-century old precedent for this episode: in Sudipt Mazumdar v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:26 pm
At issue in the developing case of TVEyes, Inc., v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:50 am
If the name rings a bell, you’re right: Dan Alban of the IJ successfully took on the Internal Revenue Service – and won – in the fight against regulating tax preparers in Loving et al v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Justice L’Heureux-Dubé invokes his name in the Supreme Court of Canada’s R. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Congress took this issue to court in the context of the Department of Justice’s refusal to turn over internal deliberations regarding the Fast & Furious matter. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Manahattan Probate Lawyers said the petitioners named and cited as interested parties, in addition to the charitable and non-charitable residuary legatees, the Attorney General of the State of New York (AG), the United States Treasury Department--Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the New York State Tax Commission (Commission). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
(ii) When offense 23 of the annexed Schedule, or an attempt to commit, or a conspiracy to commit, or being a party to the commission of that offense, has been committed on board an aircraft engaged in commercial services carrying passengers. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:05 am
[2] Mallard v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
How we’re unique: Conversation-driven intake for the internal customers of in-house legal departments. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
How we’re unique: Conversation-driven intake for the internal customers of in-house legal departments. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
