Search for: "INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
Wednesday, November 20, 2019, at 2:30 p.m.: The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Multilateral International Development, Multilateral Institutions, and International Economic, Energy and Environmental Policy will hold a hearing on the challenges and opportunities for advancing U.S. interests in the U.N. system. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
American Medical Systems, Inc., 886 F. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
The decline in the price of telecommunications service, combined with the shift in consumer purchases from telecommunications services to internet access, has forced the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to increase rates just to keep revenues constant. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
" The subcommittee will hear testimony from Carrie Filipetti, the deputy assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs; Richard Glenn, the deputy assistant secretary of state for international narcotics and law enforcement affairs; Patrick Lechleitner, the assistant director for international operations and homeland security investigations at U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
Mosley provided as evidence the expert opinion of Professor Mayer-Schönberger who stated that building such a filtering system is simple and cheap, and that such a system can filter original and copied images. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Disclaimers were available under the EUTM system, but not since 2015. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Agency for International Development. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:57 pm
This combines the 7th Annual International Satellite & Communications exchange Conference and Expo (ISCe) and the 26th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (ICSSC).51st Session of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space - June 11-20, 2008, Vienna, Austria.NewSpace 2008 - July 17-19, 2008, Crystal City, Virginia.ITU Telecom Asia 2008 - Sept. 2-5, 2008, Bangkok, Thailand.Euroconsult's World Satellite Business Week - Sept. 8-11,… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:00 pm
The consolidation also comes just a few months before the plenipotentiary meeting of the International Telecommunications Union in Busan, South Korea, where the PRC candidate for Secretary General of the organization, Houlin Zhao, is running unopposed. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Cartier: Supreme Court shifts the costs burden towards rights holders and away from ISPsCartier v British Telecommunications Plc [2018] UKSC 28, UK Supreme Court (June 2018)First looked at back in Volume I, at the Court of Appeal level, this case confirmed that blocking injunctions were available against internet service providers against websites which infringe trade marks. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
An early case that included similar claims, Cahen v. [read post]
