Search for: "Imagination Industries, Inc."
Results 181 - 200
of 740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
In Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
Caterpillar, Inc. is Trying to Cancel Our Small Business Trademark “Cat & Cloud Coffee. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:14 am
PublicResource.org Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:51 pm
Galperti, Inc., 2019 WL 2568338, No. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:48 am
The initial group of organizations that will work together on finalizing the association’s charter and become “Founding Members” upon its completion are, by industry: Payments: Mastercard, PayPal, PayU (Naspers’ fintech arm), Stripe, Visa Technology and marketplaces: Booking Holdings, eBay, Facebook/Calibra, Farfetch, Lyft, Mercado Pago, Spotify AB, Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Imagine you’re sitting at your desk and the phone rings. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We cannot imagine a world in which men do not try to rape, only one in which women can lock their doors against rapists.Conversations at the Davis Center this year have convinced me that these limits are one of law’s constitutive dilemmas. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am
Imagine the value of data in a mergers and acquisition law firm. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
Diamond Resorts International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 11:39 am
Inc., Case No. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:58 am
Imagine operating a single restaurant. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking… [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
" (quoting In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc. 122 USPQ2d 1796, 1799 (TTAB 2017).The Board further distinguished cases such as In re Weather Channel, Inc., 229 USPQ 854 (TTAB 1986), in which the Board found THE WEATHER CHANNEL to be generic for “a television transmission whose subject matter exclusively concerns the weather because viewers would understand that term as the apt descriptive name for television channel dedicated to the weather. [read post]
