Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 12,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2020, 1:56 pm
Cavender Some very interesting and fairly complex environmental law rulings have been released in the past few days. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 9:58 am
Folta v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:04 pm
From Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:06 am
With the recent focus on the new Paid Sick Leave law coming in a few weeks, it’s been easy to miss a few court cases that have come out recently that should be of interest to employers and their counsel. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
Ct. 1549 (2017) which reaffirmed the court’s commitment to the limitations on state-court jurisdiction set forth a few years ago in Daimler AG v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
[I was traveling in mid-June and a few interesting rulings fell through the cracks. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:14 am
Nonetheless, a few non-union providers were angry enough about the fee to sue the state and the union for return of their union dues and agency fees. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:54 am
–State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Over the past few weeks we’ve lightly touched on the fight between Maryland State Legislators and Maryland Law School. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Wigoda (1975)], observed that such conventions serve "the pervasive national interest in the selection of candidates for national office, and this national interest is greater than any interest of an individual State. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a long-awaited decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:10 am
There are few if any statutory default rules constraining lifetime or post-mortem transfer of shares–with all their attendant voting, economic, and other rights–by a shareholder of a close corporation. [read post]
