Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 181 - 200
of 41,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 11:39 am
The video, featuring an interview with author James Bamford, will air on C-SPAN at 6:50 a.m. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:51 pm
In reviewing eligibility for the Real Estate Exception, the SEC has taken the position that the exclusion in Section 3(c)(5)(C) may be available to an issuer if: at least 55% of its assets consist of “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate” (called “qualifying interests”) and the remaining 45% of its assets consist primarily of “real estate-type interests;” at least 80% of its total assets consist… [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:24 pm
Those sections seem to mirror sections 2(c) and 7(2) of the B.C. [read post]
12 May 2012, 2:33 pm
You might be interested in the discussion about Representing the Race at HUP's blog as well. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Some think that the public interest is virtually invariably the same as the interest of the legal professions. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:52 am
Bill C-56 expands these powers in two important ways. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:14 am
So, how do the courts go about determining the best interest of a child? [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The world—and more specifically national governments, especially the richest nations and corporate interests—should concede that it is not feasible for us to make it on foot, but we still have lots of options to make it. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Brad Hughes, Esq.Hans C. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Brad Hughes, Esq.Hans C. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Brad Hughes, Esq.Hans C. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:54 am
Sawczyn, at Epstein Becker Green, have a post on the Retail Labor and Employment Law blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the financial services industry: “New Jersey’s Appellate Division Finds Part C of the “ABC” Independent Contractor Test Does Not Require an Independent Business” Following is an excerpt: In a potentially significant decision following the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in Hargrove v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
The right to receive §207-c disability payments constitutes “a property interest giving rise to procedural due process protection, under the Fourteenth Amendment, before those payments are terminated,” and a due process hearing is triggered when an officer on §207-c status submits evidence from his treating physician supporting the officer's claim of “continued total disability. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:24 am
At the time of writing, Bill C-59 is currently at second reading in the House of Commons. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Given SOCAN’s focus on some future unknown services, it is apparent that the provision covers SOCAN’s interests. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:00 pm
The disclaimer shall be made within the time prescribed by section 68 of P.L. 2004, c.132 (C. 3B:9-4.2).3B:9-4.2 Time for disclaiming.68. a. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
Posted by Meyer C. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
L. c. 258. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
Oh, there are so many things wrong with Bill C-51, the government's proposed Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 1:57 pm
Professor Steven Solomon has raised an interesting issues concerning the ABA Council's proposal on Standard 303(c). [read post]
