Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF KENNEDY v. Kennedy"
Results 181 - 200
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:12 am
If you’re interested, you can read the opinion here. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:05 pm
I support gay marriage. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
Here’s how Justice Kennedy described the role of the factual record in conducting rational basis review in Heller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Gay marriage. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
Let’s start with the oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His replacement might be less willing to do so. * * * * * For ninety percent of readers, everything you’re going to want to know about this post appears above. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Kennedy, 2008 BCSC 331, 38 E.T.R. (3d) 289; Wilson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Olson and Boies will probably need to persuade Justice Anthony Kennedy, an oft-breaker of ties at the Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Olson and Boies will probably need to persuade Justice Anthony Kennedy, an oft-breaker of ties at the Court. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
Sixteen states banned interracial marriage when the court struck that down in Loving v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
Eastes, 179 Ind. 267, 100 N.E. 836 (1913); Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
” Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:23 pm
Perry caseUSA Today reports on how Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
Richard Nixon, President of the United States, shaking his jowels and intoning the famous words one should never actually say, even if they're true, because the mocking will know no bounds:I'm not a crook.Now, with special thanks to Jonathan Turley and Paul Kennedy, we have the words of the estimable Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace for the 8th Ward in Louisiana's Tangipahoa Parish:I am not a racist.Of course, backing up these sorts of claims is different than… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
