Search for: "In Re: Briggs "
Results 181 - 200
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 1:32 am
The Commission refused, and refused again following the quashing of its first decision by Briggs J. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:21 pm
The controversy is now proceeding under District Court docket 12-398, In re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Continued Access to Counsel. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Crisp, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Thursday, August 2, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Books and records, Business judgment rule, Corwin, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL Section 220, Discovery, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Shareholder Proposal Developments During the 2018 Proxy Season Posted by Ron Mueller, Beth Ising, and Aaron Briggs, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher… [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:48 pm
This invites re-imaging of a system of resolution that better meets the goals of complainants. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:59 am
(Recall 1980, when the Briggs Initiative to ban gay public schoolteachers in the state was predicted likely to pass, but ultimately went down to defeat after popular Republican ex-governor and presidential candidate Ronald Reagan came out in opposition shortly before the election...) [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
Briggs, 698 F.2d at 495, n.29 ('the government is, of course, free to rebut this presumption by showing for example, procedures in place to prevent such intragovernmental communications.'). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
By a majority of two to one (Briggs LJ dissenting) it held that the proper purpose doctrine had no significance to the application of article 42. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
Briggs (1986), extending the “so lacking in indicia of probable cause” standard to qualified immunity. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
” Ms Kireeva’s counsel pointed to the case of Re Kooperman [(1928) 13 B&CR 49] (“Re Kooperman”) as an example of the court granting such relief. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
You're not the only one ...After earlier posts on the issue here and here, Merpel returns to the EPO strike, this time recounting the tale of an EPO Board of Appeal member who had just been suspended from office and escorted from the building. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:22 pm
We don’t get Fall Break this year so I’m not sure when I’ll be able to turn everything around, but I’m hoping now that we’re through appropriations season in SBA I’ll be able to catch up. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
As Myers-Briggs classified us, some people make decisions faster than others, so the ratio of inner debate to action taken varies by person. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 16 Conference. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
The EU’s own reviews of the Regulations (Rome II currently underway) will provide a useful trigger for the UK to re-assess its own rules with a view to making appropriate changes, whether keeping in step with or departing from the EU model. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v Briggs-Price the House held that if prosecutors wished to introduce alleged benefit from offences not proved at the trial they would have to do so to the criminal standard. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
C’s costs do not form part of the “pot” of money against which D may enforce its costs. (4) D’s points re policy and legislative intention are in effect that same as those rejected in Ho. (5) There is prima facie binding authority confirming that DAs are not standalone proceedings. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
KZ 7170 D49 2011 The signature of evil : (re)defining torture in international law / Steven Dewulf. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Lord Briggs, Lord Kitchin, L [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:47 pm
Briggs, 52 A.D.2d 1053, 384 N.Y.S.2d 894). [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
