Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
While the event was held online, the technology, the structure, and the facilitators and judges made all of the competitors feel as though they were still working side by side. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
In fact, in his tribute speech to Justice Scalia last year, Judge Gorsuch embraced Justice Scalia’s philosophy of judicial restraint: “If you’re going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that you’re not always going to like the conclusions you reach. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm
The case is before Judges Tatel and Griffith and Senior Judge Williams. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:50 am
The law is designed to change the way sex offenders are ranked on their risk to re-offend, how often they need to report to law enforcement, and who is informed about their status. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:25 am
In re Stonemaier LLC, Serial No. 90731004 (November 8, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jennifer L. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
They’re designed to evoke an emotional response.” [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:28 am
On January 22, 2009, Congress re-started its efforts to improve patent litigation by introducing legislation that would designate certain courts and experienced judges to hear patent cases at the district court level. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 4:22 am
In re In re Anton Anisimov, Serial No. 88149531 (November 29, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark INVOODOO for "Computer software consulting, not including game software; Software design and development, not including gaming software" in view of the registered mark VOODOO for "Designing and developing downloadable electronic game software"]. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 1:47 pm
But we won't deem the thing worthy of inclusion into a paper record designed to last centuries.'Cause some things are just to patently silly that even though they merit a response, there's no need to put actual ink to physical paper.Like here. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
[Answer in first comment].In re I.L.L.A. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
This point of law had been agitating the French jurisprudence since 2012, despite a ruling of the CJEU in 2015, against which the French appeal judges subsequently resisted. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:36 pm
(In re Sierra Concrete Design, Inc.), Adv. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:23 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Iron Balls International, Serial No. 87299536 (January 16, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark IRON BALLS ENGINEERED ALCOHOL & Design for "gin" [ENGINEERED ALCOHOL disclaimed] in view of the registered mark IRON BALLS for "beer"].In re Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, LLC, Serial No. 87042698 (January 15, 2019) [not precedential]… [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:34 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Lahana Pty Ltd., Serial No. 79237803 (April 8, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
"] In re Panini America, Inc., Serial No. 90004362 (March 22, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:37 am
In re Suarez Industries, Inc., Serial No. 97602779 (April 10, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
16 May 2020, 3:55 am
It’s not only an honest approach, but one designed to get an answer, if an answer can be given. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:54 pm
A three-judge panel of the D.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 4:24 am
So now they're blathering again. [read post]
