Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 181 - 200
of 7,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2018, 11:06 pm
I’m sure the color green is considered difficult to protect for sustainable building materials, but this color mark was narrowed down to the particular Pantone shade. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:06 am
Márquez also explicitly evoked a stirring re-grounding in the Colombian context of the Rev. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:02 am
"** Mark's a great guy, and a wonderful lawyer, but he's about as different from me as someone who would fit my superficial police description (6'2"+; 200 lb. + white male, brown hair, glasses, over 40, lawyer, married, parent) could be: he's perpetually cheerful when I'm saturnine; he's relaxed and Southern and small-towny where I'm a perpetual pent-up Northern cosmopole, etc. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:11 pm
(Re-produced below without permission, but in order to spread the idea, as I'm sure he would agree with.) [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:11 pm
It was probably the correct legal decision, though not the correct moral one.I'm posting to share this link: Today, Ted Olson and David Boies filed a federal equal protection claim challenging the validity of Proposition 8. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
You’re right baby. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:13 am
By Mark S. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
THE EYECLOPS BIONICAM, which was getting a lot of pre-Christmas buzz, is now marked down sixty bucks to $19.99. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 4:57 am
But I’m guessing you do. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:57 am
In re NTA Enterprise, Inc., Serial No. 77575867 (August 6, 2010) [not precedential].The Marks: Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be similar. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
I’m a victim of a crime. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
The Board proceeded with its analysis of the likelihood of confusion factors set forth in In re E. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
We view the mark as a unitary whole wherein no one term is dominant.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: I'm not buying the Board's reasoning. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:05 pm
It's a heck of a week for chow around here, and I'm still hungry. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:00 am
I'm not going there. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
In re E. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:16 pm
Police officer to me: “I do have some questions for your client, but I’m not goofy enough to think you’re going to let him answer them. [read post]
Precedential No. 2: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Proposed Multi-Color Mark for Breakfast Cereals
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
See In re Owens-Corning, 227 USPQ 417, 424 (Fed. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 8:19 am
In re Systemax Inc., Serial Nos. 88150991 and 88151072 (September 23, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Christen M. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
The business of Applicant Robert M. [read post]
