Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases" Results 181 - 200 of 548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 8:23 am by Elizabeth Kruska
I bring this up only because when you’re dealing with jury instructions, there are specific times to object, and if you don’t do it right, you may not preserve it correctly. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:36 pm
A jury found Billups guilty of the charged offense. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Sotomayor pointed out that the instructions given to the jury allowed it to “convict Perez based on what he ‘stated’ alone. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm by John Elwood
This is one of those dull cases the Supreme Court is reduced to taking because they’re shorthanded and want to avoid controversial cases. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:41 am by SHG
While I have been on the federal bench over 20 years and have presided over tons of criminal cases and hundreds of jury trials, I have never sat as a judge on an ordinary rape case. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
The quoted case descriptions are from Westlaw, except where described as quotations from Gorsuch. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Rosenfeld, supra, 34 N.J. at 138 and 143.The Trial Judge will read the following instructions to the jury prior to the jury deciding damages and negligence:[Option A: Specialist. ] The defendant(s) in this case is (are) a medical specialist(s) in the field of [insert appropriate specialty description]. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Diamond, supra.The court goes on to explain that the Fifth Amendment provides that no person `shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:24 pm
We also consider the jury instructions given by the trial court, the State's theory and any defensive theories, closing arguments, and even voir dire, if material to the defendant's claim.Kahlid Yusuf Worrell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
As might be expected, Gruender has ruled consistently against criminal defendants in death penalty cases, including cases alleging that lethal injection protocols violate the Eighth Amendment and cases involving challenges to death sentences by defendants who claim intellectual disabilities. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
C.K-D., 2016 SCC 41 (36877) Judgment rendered Oct. 18, 2016 Justice Wagner: “The trial judge’s charge to the jury as a whole conveyed the correct instruction to the jury on the proper approach [as to how a young person’s evidence is to be considered] to assessing A.Y. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Eric Muller
 It's a double jeopardy case that involves what the parties describe as inconsistent criminal jury verdicts. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am by Heidi A. Nadel
and requirements for instructions to the grand jury (Commonwealth v. [read post]