Search for: "In Re: United States of America, Petitioner"
Results 181 - 200
of 270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 10:53 am
Because this is a story of a family that the United States of America decided should not be allowed to suffer in silence while they were being victimized by a crime punishable under the laws of this country. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
” The final point ended up consuming a good bit of Hallward-Driemeier’s time: what to make of the decision of the major institutional actors that appeared in the case – the United States and the Bank of America – to file on the debtor’s side, supporting the right to appeal. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
” In re Enron Corp. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
They’re asking regulators to clean up America’s poppy seed supply by setting a maximum threshold for opiate contamination and establishing controls on imported seeds. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
” At Reason, Damon Root maintains that, “[a]pplied on its face, the federal prohibition against encouraging illegal immigration for financial gain” at issue in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
Rumsfeld had everything to do with the fact that the petitioner was a U.S. citizen. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Chatman, 14-8589, involves a fairly thorny habeas procedural issue that, if you’re a real sucker for that sort of thing, you can read more about on your own d**n time. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
United States, 195 U.S. 138, 145, 149, and to the consular courts established by concessions from foreign countries, In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453, 464-465, 480. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
And the Chief posed a similar question for the United States as amicus curiae: You're confident that the mootness question is easy. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:34 pm
” Citing In re American Rivers, 372 F.3d 413, 419 (D.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:34 pm
” Citing In re American Rivers, 372 F.3d 413, 419 (D.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
After all, doesn’t BAHA’s § 1(e) define “workers in the United States” and “United States workers” as described in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
