Search for: "In Re Adjudication of Water Rights" Results 181 - 200 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Worse, and of particular relevance to this Symposium, courts may misunderstand either the prerequisites for or the meaning of incontestability, allowing trademark claimants to assert rights that they don’t actually have. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
Accordingly, the ECtHR did not have to adjudicate which party held an actual proprietary right to the statue.[17] This allowed the Court to bypass all the – rather thorny – questions of choice of law, which typically plague cultural property disputes.[18] In this case, for example, the ECtHR found that, after forty years of continuous possession, the Getty Museum had acquired a fair expectation in the “peaceful enjoyment” of the statue. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:36 pm
I could see fish swim by in the shallow water as they passed beneath me. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:50 am by Jane Turner
The prosecutor clips out the part of the conversation that you’re not supposed to listen to and it does not become part of the case. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
Rangel and Representative Maxine Waters, issued by the Committee on October 7, 2010. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The lawsuit industry has thus often embraced the false equivalence between agency pronouncements on harmful medicinal, environmental, or occupational exposures and civil litigation adjudication of tortious harms. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Charter In the years immediately following the adoption of the Charter, some scholars suggested that it should be interpreted so as to provide protection for socio-economic rights, including the right to health care. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am by admin
  We’re not sorry to see you go   Justice Douglas was doing more than penning a manifesto. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Chimène Keitner
Justice Gorsuch asked the United States’ lawyer Eric Feigin whether he agreed that “the principle was pretty clear … at the time of the founding that one state couldn’t set up its criminal courts to adjudicate the sovereign acts of another country” and that “a suit against a sovereign qua sovereign” is not something that U.S. courts “would have accepted” in criminal cases (Tr. at 67). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[6] In Canada, this connection between philosophy and law is borne out by the biographies of certain adjudicators. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Marty Lederman
  We’re all very familiar with it—indeed, you’ve probably seen it in action far more frequently than you’ve witnessed hearings designed to help craft new legislation. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In the present case, by contrast, Mother sought nothing from DHS other than her basic right to be left alone. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
That should pretty well kill the issue, right? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
If a defendant invokes their Fifth Amendment right, is the court able to draw any adverse inference? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Pablo Arrocha Olabuenaga
Charter and the creation of the United Nations after World War II, which established a collective security system that, as a general rule, prohibits the use of force as well as the development of international law, in particular international human rights law, international humanitarian law (IHL), and international criminal law. [read post]