Search for: "In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure"
Results 181 - 200
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
LOCASCIO AND IN RE: ESTATE OF SILVIA M. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
We’re accepting wagers on what the Court will do with these two rehearing petitions at the fast-approaching end of the Term. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
As criminal defense attorneys, we have a unique perspective on the irrational behavior of the “Department. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
Virginia (1980), which took that view as to criminal trials). [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Alabama, holding that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The clarified standard for rule 12(b)(6) motions adopted here will apply to any amended complaint that the plaintiffs may file.Iannacchino v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Powell rule that Fourth Amendment claims aren’t cognizable on habeas). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
Dirk received his bachelor’s degree in the Classics from the University of Florida and earned his Juris Doctor from the Wake Forest University School of Law in 2011. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
AbramsonAmicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure ProfessorsAmicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of OregonAmicus brief for Professor Kate StithAmicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 1:50 pm
A typical news cycle (I think that means about a week, in journalist-lingo) will find people asking me opinions on the first amendment, the fourth and fifth, criminal law, criminal sentencing, civil procedure, torts, defamation, drug use, and drug testing. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Florida to the case. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Their criminal and civil “rules of procedure” trump everything. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
The court denied certiorari in all the relisted cases that involved robbery statutes other than Florida’s, suggesting that the justices think those states’ robbery statutes are too dissimilar for those petitioners to benefit from a ruling in favor of Denard Stokeling. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Elsewhere on the criminal docket, Hurst v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
Second Circuit: First Amendment, Schmirst Amendment. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm
We're dubious. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
LEXIS 479 (Ga. 6/13/2011) “[T]he trial court erred regarding the burden of proof to be applied to Stripling’s claim of mental retardation, that the trial court did not err by ruling that standard criminal procedural rules would apply to Stripling’s retrial on the issue of mental retardation, and that the trial court erred by ruling that it lacked the authority to consider any plea bargain that the parties might be willing to enter… [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
French and Nott discussed the case of Florida pastor Rodney Howard-Browne and other faith leaders who have defied stay-at-home orders to hold services. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The DC Court noted that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides an interested person with the right to petition for issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule and, if the SEC were to deny the petition, the unsuccessful petitioner could seek review of that decision in the court of appeals after a First Amendment argument has been squarely made to the SEC; “they are not required to violate the regulation and risk prosecution to test their… [read post]
