Search for: "In Re Application of Warren"
Results 181 - 200
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D–California), Warren Davidson (R–Ohio), and Pramila Jayapal (D–Washington) introduced the Safeguarding Americans’ Private Records Act (SAPRA), H.R 5675. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm
“They’re stored in a different place. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
We note that the NGO “Privacy International” has a re-designed website. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
‘Keepin’ it real fake’ (IP Dragon) NERA releases report on IP litigation and damages trends in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Another record year for Chinese patent applications and grants (IAM) International copyright exchange centre established in Beijing (China Blawg) Trade mark applications may be submitted online (China Hearsay) Ethiopia Ethiopia to upgrade IP law, eye WIPO membership (Afro-IP) (Intellectual… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:49 am
And I pay the same rate as Warren Buffett. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
J. 621, 623 (1964) (quoting letter from Chief Justice Warren to the Honorable Edwin A. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm
Alternatively, take Warren Buffett's word for it; who said: "When I see memos from Howard Marks in my mail, they're the first thing I open and read. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:48 am
When most people say they're worried about "getting sued," they're usually talking about being responsible a large tort verdict arising from a catastrophic injury or wrongful death. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Go after them first, if you’re going after anyone! [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
They're targeting single-judge divisions. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:19 pm
So they get $6.5 million, not $10 million - just as they would have if there were no dividends-paid deduction and the company had nonetheless decided to pay out all of its after-tax earnings as an immediate dividend.What's happened so far at the entity level, by reason of the proposal, is purely a re-labeling. [read post]
29 May 2020, 2:07 pm
On May 20, Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren and Republican Warren Davidson urged House leaders to allow a vote on an amendment, styled as a companion to the Wyden-Daines amendment that had just barely failed in the Senate. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm
It was a good fit for a Court signaling a retreat from the Warren Court’s challenges to the status quo. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
Notice that this intuitive approach is not completely off base: many of the earlier Warren court opinions discussed exclusion in almost moral terms (look back at the Mapp opinion and you'll see what I mean). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled that racism in the application of the death penalty doesn’t matter, we’re finally beginning to have an honest discussion about how we justify legally killing people. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 15 and Wednesday 16 May, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Warren v The State (Pitcairn). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
” Their case would have more resonance if they addressed one of the major reasons for the futility of habeas relief: the substantial restrictions imposed on its use and application by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK According to Michelle Kwon of the University of Tennessee College of Law, most roadblocks in regulation occur in the phase before public notice-and-comment. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am
Dojc, 2011 ONSC 3795 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered a re-trial in a libel case based on the publication of alleged defamatory emails to members of a Yahoo group. [read post]
