Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Witness Subpoenas"
Results 181 - 200
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
A federal grand jury on Monday indicted House of Raeford Farms and plant manager Gregory Steenblock on 14 counts of violating the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
"They're drivers that knowingly speed. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
Hybrids will give way to fully electric (and perhaps hemp-powered) [9] vehicles (effective or defective) and though electricity will continue to be generated by hydroelectric dams, wind farms and nuclear power plants, some new and unimaginable source of power will surely push back the nights of my grand children's children. [10] Law, politics, society and culture also exist in the 200-year present of conflict resolution. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
In an effort to get the contents of the emails, the FBI agents have a grand jury subpoena me and the email recipients; the subpoena orders us to show up before the grand jury and describe the contents of the email messages. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
U.S authorities might also serve a subpoena on a foreign bank witness by relying on In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Bank of Nova Scotia), 740 F.2d 817 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1106 (1985). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:29 pm
By contrast, an investigating agent collecting statements from witnesses (or even . . . a suspect) does not always act as `an arm of the grand jury,' and `what use will be made of false testimony given to an investigating agent who has not been subpoenaed or otherwise directed to appear before the grand jury is ... speculative.' [Aguilar, supra.]) [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 3:03 pm
” This takes the subpoena out of the territory covered by In re Grand Jury Subpoena. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:35 am
Witnesses are required to answer questions in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings such as grand jury or legislative hearings. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:09 pm
The gist of the Maryland grand jury subpoena is for Simels' records of fee payments with regard to Green, under the theory that Simels was being paid while Green was in the wind and engaged in drug dealing. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:51 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Doe. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:10 pm
Some OCSD witnesses gave testimony that mischaracterized the protocol and history of custodial dea [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:15 am
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated Oct. 22, 2001, the court recognized a difference between "need" in the context of trial testimony, where corroboration is important, and need in the context of grand jury testimony, where the issue is simply establishing probable cause. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
(United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Re: Grand Jury Matter, Magistrate Nos. 07-552-M-1, M-2, M-3, Order, May 4, 2007.) [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 2:03 am
Incidentally, on the same page of the Ford notes, Ford 0012, just a few lines from the top, it says that Schloemer did not want Ford to become a paid consultant until after he testified before a grand jury. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
Trent Lott, and recall also that Hood has stated in open court in Harrison County, on April 11, 2006, that he already had many of the State Farm documents that he was requesting through grand jury subpoenas: "We know what a lot of it that they're going to produce and we're just going to see if they actually give us what is written on them and stuck to them and so forth. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 7:56 am
In an early computer evidence case - In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 846 F. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
.: American Association of Retired Persons Abandon: To knowingly give up without intent to return or re-claim. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
See In re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 and 04-124-05, 454 F.3d at 515 (stating that movant could not be criticized for failing to provide a privilege log before he had an opportunity to review the records.) [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:19 pm
Memo From the Defense Bar to the Justice Department: Henceforth, if you subpoena our clients to appear before a Grand Jury, we’ll make a deal with you. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:22 am
And Fitzgerald seems to have drawn that conclusion only after taking grand jury testimony from Armitage.) [read post]
