Search for: "In Re Investigation of Circuit Judge" Results 181 - 200 of 2,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
If judges can’t agree on what the law requires, we’re a long way from having a workable standard that employers can use to guide their decisions. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:54 am
by Orin Kerr: On October 2, the Fifth Circuit will hold oral argument in case No. 11–20884, In Re Applications of the United States for Historical Cell-Site Data. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Becerra, Ninth Circuit] California’s legislature has long been itching to gut or repeal Proposition 109 (1996), in which voters banned race and sex preferences. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 10:35 am by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Bateman, the Sixth Circuit re-emphasized that point. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:13 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
Inheritance cases are almost always bench trials, which means they’re decided by a jury of one: your judge. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 4:22 am by SHG
Of course no college Title IX investigator announced to the accused male student, “While you probably didn’t do anything wrong, we’re still going to expel you because you’re a guy and we have to believe survivors, no matter how ridiculous their complaint. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
Hendrickson, 26 F.3d 321 (1994), Judge Sotomayor, still a district judge but sitting by designation on the Second Circuit, considered questions regarding burdens of proof with respect to drug quantity for sentencing purposes in a drug conspiracy case. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Trask
 Toyota also noted that a NHTSA investigation was underway. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
Similar Posts: IRS Seeks Info on US Taxpayers Hiding Income Tax Schemes to Run Screaming From Sidley Austin Lives to See Another Day Re: You’re Being Investigated for Tax Fraud And So It Begins: E-File Officially Opens for 2009 [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:59 am
”Id. at *5-6 (quoting In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 87 F.3d 377, 381-83 (9th Cir. 1996)).The Ninth Circuit identified a circuit split (are you listening, Supremes?) [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:38 am
 But the Ninth Circuit case number here begins with a 12-. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Phil Dixon
The trial judge stated: “I read your submissions carefully, and it’s obvious to me that you’re not a sophisticated person as far as your knowledge of the law. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:13 am by David Zaring
” stuff, and probably best characterized either as political decisionmaking by three Republican judges, or the discomfort that complicated rules often cause judges (why the 3% ownership stake, and why the inability to use the rule if you’re trying to take over the company? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Marty Lederman
  We’re all very familiar with it—indeed, you’ve probably seen it in action far more frequently than you’ve witnessed hearings designed to help craft new legislation. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lyle Denniston
In a two-page order issued on Wednesday, a three-judge Circuit Court panel said that conditions had changed since the Circuit Court last November allowed the Pentagon to go on enforcing the ban. [read post]