Search for: "In Re Levinson"
Results 181 - 200
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Michael GreveFor the symposium on Michael Greve's The Upside Down Constitution (Harvard University Press 2012).Jack Balkin has been a dear friend for many years. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:45 am
See In re DVI, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:12 pm
Jarvis turned to Matthew and said, “I’m the old broom – you’re the new broom. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
See In re Salomon Analyst Metromedia Litig., 544 F.3d 474 (2d Cir. 2008); Oscar Private Equity Invs. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm
AfricaIllegal peace in Africa : an inquiry into the legality of power-sharing with African warlords, rebels, and junta / Jeremy I. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:37 am
" Why would one believe that, particularly in a constitutional system that generates perverse incentives for the congressional opponents--the "recalcitrant Republican opposition"-- of a president to deny him any accomplishments that could prove useful in a re-election bid? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
Sanford Levinson is the W. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
They’re subleasing? [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm
” Most likely, focusing on the “total mix” definition was simply consistent with the Court re-affirming the no-bright-line-rules aspect of materiality. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
All of us, presumably, recognize that there are occasions for drawing lines in the sand, even as we also must, unless we’re truly fanatics, recognize that politics requires a willingness to settle for significantly less than we might wish, not least in order to preserve social peace.I have now read the book, and I would have answered the question differently, for one of the striking things about their book, written, of course, by two world-class political theorists, is the degree to… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
Wendt, 618 F.3d 679 (7th Cir. 2010); In re DVI, Inc. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:06 am
Levinson is and they're growing like hotcakes, however unhappy it makes them in Austin. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 am
Levinson, Esq. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
We’re on your side, Mills family. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:22 pm
In reverse chronological order, I see Harcourt (Chicago), Spiesel (research scholar Yale), Graber (Maryland), Levinson (Texas), Slobogin (Vanderbilt), Sherry (Vanderbilt), Tushnet (Harvard), Strauss (Chicago), Lawson (B.U., formerly Northwestern), Ackerman (Yale), Morrison (Columbia), Chafetz (Cornell), Sachs (Duke), Vazquez (Georgetown). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
"It could be argued that this is commercial use because you're using it to apply for a patent, but I really think that's a bit of a stretch," he said. [read post]