Search for: "In Re Proposals D & H"
Results 181 - 200
of 833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
(D. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:08 am
Mel: What'd you do? [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
Lincoln (D-AR). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
[The one thing these senators can agree on: They’re about to do something very bad] Implicit in my discussion is that I don’t believe a 60-vote rule really gives us “moderate” nominees. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
SCOV is puzzled—the statute doesn’t seem to require that notice also include a weather report on whether or not it’d be granted. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Proposed Modifications to the Law AB 1539 first proposes to prohibit one charity from using another charity’s name in an internet-based solicitation without getting the written consent of such other charity. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
That’s why we’re updating our rules for the technology and business models of the 2020s. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:07 pm
H. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
Complete Proposed Text of Florida Medical Marijuana Law - Senate BillBelow is the complete text of the Florida Senate Bill of the proposed Medical Marijuana Statute in Florida. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
William H. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
William H. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
That is, the time required for the Georgia trial “shall be excluded in computing the time” under the federal Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(1)(B) (excluding “delay resulting from trial with respect to other charges against the defendant”). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
Since the endorsement of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights in 2011 (A/HRC/RES/17/4), the Human Rights Council has attached to that project two related things. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
GO TO 1.5 No H. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
Due to 999.315(h)’s high legal standards and 999.313(d)(1)’s low legal standards, businesses will feel pressured to treat [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm
& Ogden H. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
For transactions that fall outside of existing Part 32 or Part 35, the Proposed Order would provide exemptive relief to the extent those transactions (and persons offering or entering into such transactions) came within the scope of any of the existing CEA Sections 2(d), 2(e), 2(g), 2(h), and 5d as in effect prior to July 16, 2011 or the “line of business” provision. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Does 1-20, No. 16CV2218 H (BGS), 2017 WL 1520085, *3 (S.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
See AFM 22.2(d)(1). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:57 am
Dannel Patrick Malloy (D). [read post]
