Search for: "In Re Termination of Parent Child Rel." Results 181 - 200 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
  This approach applies even where the adverse publicity that threatens to harm the child is the direct result of the actions of one of the child’s parents. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Eric Goldman - Capricious Account Terminations and 47 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm by David Ettinger
:  What injury must a parent show in order to have standing to contest the denial of a petition for modification seeking placement of a child with a relative when the petition is brought after termination of reunification services but before the selection and implementation hearing? [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) (plurality opinion), which we have implemented in In re Adoption of C.A.,137 P.3d 318 (Colo. 2006), and in In re B.J., 242 P.3d 1128 (Colo. 2010)....Just as the fit parents’ decision to consent to a guardianship is presumed to be in the best interests of the child, so too their decision to seek termination of the guardianship and regain care, custody, and control of the child is presumed to be in the best… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatively small player, but Tenn. was concerned that the business model had been adopted by others—frontloading payments for goods that won’t be delivered for a year and that are charged inflated prices. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am by PaulKostro
During the entire pre-adoption placement period, the Child Placement Bill of Rights Act, N.J.S.A. 9:6B-1 to -6 (Child Placement Act), obligates the Division “to nurture sibling bonds . . . whether or not a sibling has initiated the process and whether or not termination [of parental rights] has occurred. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
‘s unknown biological father, found that no suitable relative existed with whom the child could be placed, and re-committed her to the custody of DFACS for adoption. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Church to file applications for a real property tax exemption with the city of Schenectady A3103A/S4018-A: Adds registered nurse and licensed practical nurse to assault of emergency medical professionals and provides for class C and D felonies for physical injury to them A3397/S4981: Requires model zoning and planning guidelines that foster age-integrated communities to provide for mixed-use development for senior residential housing A3467B/S7820-A: Relates to the humane treatment of animals and… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Melinda Deel
  In a footnote, the Court cites a number of opinions in which the Court found the child had proper care and custody while the parent was incarcerated when the child was left with a fit relative. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:17 pm by Walt Williams
The child’s parent’s rights were terminated in a proceeding under this chapter; 3. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm by PaulKostro
The issue of forced relative visitation in non-relative adoptions was addressed in In re the Adoption of Child by W.P. and M.P., 163 N.J. 158 (2000) (W.P.). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Witzke Berry PLLC
These efforts can be defeated by a long-term illness of the parent or the death of a child. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:05 am by PaulKostro
Rather, the statute provides that adoption terminates the parental rights of the adopted child’s biological parents: The entry of a judgment of adoption shall terminate all parental rights and responsibilities of the parent towards the adoptive child. . . . [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
  “Spare the rod, and spoil the child. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
The Court granted leave to appeal in In re Hansen Minor, Case No. 139507. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:23 pm
  The mother made multiple attempts to place the child with relatives or friends during her incarceration, but all attempts failed. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Although the children had no cause of action, the parents' claim for wrongful birth did receive significant damages and relatively high costs. [read post]