Search for: "In Re US Lines, Inc."
Results 181 - 200
of 3,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In contrast, in a line of cases beginning with the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2001 opinion in In re Siliconix Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 6:34 am
Read the complaint at: Letter from ISH to NEB re Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc. 2011 Willowlake Pipeline Spill Operating Costs Complaint. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
She got there well before the hearing started, but there was a line. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:39 am
November 18, 2021 - 1 PM: In re L-Nutra, Inc., Serial No. 88757432 [Mere descriptiveness refusal of 5-DAY FASTING DIET for "Nutritionally balanced prepared meals for medical use consisting primarily of grains, nuts and vegetables, sold to the consumer only after a medical consultation with a doctor or other medical personnel, or upon the completion of a medical questionnaire; nutritional meal replacement drinks, soups and snacks adapted for medical… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rev. 2550, 2550 (June 2001).AlabamaEx parte Household Retail Services, Inc., 744 So.2d 871, 880 n. 2 (Ala. 1999); Ex parte Exxon Corp., 725 So.2d 930, 933 n.3 (Ala. 1998).AlaskaWe didn’t find anything useful along these lines under Alaska law.ArizonaOsuna v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
They’re Letting Corporations Do It Instead.USA Today – Rob O’Dell (Arizona Republic) and Mark Penzenstadler | Published: 4/4/2019 A two-year investigation reveals for the first time the extent to which special interests have infiltrated state Legislatures using model legislation. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:31 am
” In a well-publicized and discussed case in the Noerr line of authority, the Court in Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:55 am
On the other hand, copying a line or two for a section about the content of those two lines would most certainly fall under fair use. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
In re White Rock Distilleries Inc., 92 USPQ2d 1282, 1284 (TTAB 2009). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
“Hey, Kent . . . the Foreign Minster of Iran is on line 2. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:05 pm
"McCormack said that a CAR-T approach uses a patient's own "re-engineered" cells to kill cancer tumors. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:19 am
" In re Banom, Inc., Serial No. 78869262 (May 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney relied on third-party registrations and on Internet evidence showing "various brands of protective gloves and other kinds of work gloves being offered by [three] on-line retailer[s] of such products along with different brands of street shoes and/or work boots. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:18 am
According to the story, prosecutors are said to be "reviewing the business procedures" of Docx LLC, a subsidiary of Lender Processing Services, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
In re Magverz, Inc., Serial No. 85614128 (February 21, 2014) [not precedential].Because the involved goods are, in part, identical, the Board must presume that these identical goods travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
—Andrew Miller, Intern, Fast Horse Inc. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
C R Bard Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:51 am
In re National Presto Industries, Inc., Serial No. 85883551 (April 19, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 7:33 pm
Then one should have one's lines sufficently rehearsed or have the teleprompter in front , not to your right as in Meligan's case, so that it seems like you're playing "zoom schwartz profigliano". [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 4:47 am
In re Steelbuilding.com, Inc., Serial Nos. 76280389 and 76280390 (December 12, 2007) [not precedential].Readers will recall that in 2005, the CAFC held that STEELBUILDING.COM was not generic but rather merely descriptive for virtually identical services, and further that Applicant had failed to establish acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:09 am
Isn't it because you're trying to promote something else, even as you donate your work to Twitter, Inc.? [read post]
