Search for: "In re: Bowers" Results 181 - 200 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am by Family Law Attorneys
Webb asked opposing counsel's husband, then state representative Edward Lindsey, for a letter of recommendation for re-appointment by the governor of Georgia to a professional board. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Burger Court & the Rise of the Judicial Right (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 450), by Michael J. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were no statements in open court last week Last week in the Courts On Monday 18 June 2017, Warby J handed down judgment in Brown v Bower  ([2017] EWHC 1388 (QB)). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 7:39 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If you’re a practicing trusts and estates attorney, sample documents vetted by well-represented parties in real life transactions are gold. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Rulings Resolution Statement 20406-17 Scott v mirror.co.uk, principles 1 (accuracy), 2 privacy, 4 (intrusion into grief or shock), 5 (reporting suicide), 6 (children) and 12 (discrimination) Resolution Statement 04079-18 A man v That’s Life, principles 2 (privacy), 14 (confidential sources), 16 (payments to criminals) and 1 (accuracy) 03178- 18 Johnstone v The Scottish Sun, principle 1 (accuracy), no breach Statements in Open Court and Apologies The parties in the case of Brown v… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project has a post about the judgment in Re B (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1579 last week. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
We note that the NGO “Privacy International” has a re-designed website. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
It is also virtually impossible to defend today, was put into the Constitution by Framers who didn’t trust the People to elect the president, and yet we’re still stuck with it. (3) Perhaps more important than the Constitution’s containing some indefensible provisions is the fact that it’s largely irrelevant to current political arrangements: We’ve ignored the document, and the Supreme Court, its supposed guardian, has largely acquiesced in that arrangement (and… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm by Frank Pasquale
It’s hard to be a good husband or wife if you’re broke or broken by a martinetish manager. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm by Adam Feldman
The discussion over who would fill the Supreme Court vacancy has dominated much of the political conversation since Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court on June 27. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette had a piece “Mail publisher pays damages to Palestinian centre over ‘grotesque’ libel in Tom Bower serialisation”. [read post]