Search for: "In re: Wells, et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2022, 2:46 pm
Bhatt, Eugene Braunwald, Gabriel Steg, Jaime Davidson, et al., for the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators, “Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” 369 New Engl. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
Most recently, in the May 2019 Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal, the ICC’s Appeals Chamber considered Jordan’s failure to arrest then Sudanese President Al-Bashir (against whom warrants had been issued for crimes under international law), when he traveled to the territory of Jordan. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
If the terms of a potential divorce are not set in advance, the terms of the potential divorce will be the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, 750 ILCS 5/et al. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:51 am
Adobe et al., Case 1:10-cv-01629-RBW (D.D.C. 2010). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:00 am
But the pandemic blunted many of the rewards typically given to those who engage in “costly signaling” as stress on the economy drained the incentive structures that once rewarded going “above and beyond” (Bereczkei et al., 2010). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Baumeister et al., “Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life,” 8 J Positive Psych 505 (2013). [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
CMP et al. had no First Amendment right to break the laws they broke. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
City of Toronto et al v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation et al., No. 2:22-cv-00459 (M.D. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
American Civil Liberties Union Brandt et al v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 7:20 am
Geisinger Health, et al. called mostly strikes against the EEOC at the motion to dismiss stage, with two exceptions. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Neville-Lake et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
[Bloomberg's "The Trace" fabricates a conspiracy about amicus brief writers who adhere to Supreme Court Rules] If you're looking for a website like QAnon, but catering to gun control advocates, you will enjoy some articles from The Trace, a gun control website founded and funded by Michael Bloomberg. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm
’ Conceptually distinct from the default, it could well have preferential claims if empirically demonstrated to provide greater epistemic access and explanatory insight into artistic phenomena. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Slavkin et al., 2022 ONSC 2964 (CanLII)). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
[3] West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
The first is that the gatekeeping role does not sit well with many judges. [read post]
