Search for: "In re Amendments to the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules" Results 181 - 200 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
The petition asks whether the California Supreme Court violates the First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances by barring prisoners represented in name only from making pro se filings. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Alabama, in which the Court held that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
After the Supreme Court decided Descamps v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Thereafter the Supreme Court handed down Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
The jury convicted Ayala, and the California Supreme Court affirmed. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
By July 2011, the Court had not yet ruled, and the case was re-assigned to another judge. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Initially, the district court in Oklahoma denied Hobby Lobby’s request for an injunction, and the district court in Pennsylvania denied Conestoga’s request. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  She informs us that Oklahoma has re-enacted at least part of the tort reform legislation (see here for our previous discussion), that the Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down on technical (single subject) grounds in Douglas v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defendants allege that the ruling of the Swiss court is preclusive of the plaintiff’s claims under the doctrine of res judicata and principles of international comity. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Ilya Shapiro
Here’s some background on the one that won the race to the Supreme Court: In 1970, David Green founded Hobby Lobby, a picture-frame company, in his Oklahoma City garage. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
  These propositions have been recognized by courts at every level, from the United States Supreme Court on down. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The majority was led to that conclusion by two Supreme Court rulings based upon the “political process” rationale. [read post]
But, the new 12-month rule (rather than the old nine-month rule) applies to these credits also. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Melville Fuller, declared on a narrow vote of 5-4 that law to be unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:20 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's abortion rights rulings and thus the proposed amendment could not appear on the Oklahoma ballot. [read post]