Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation"
Results 181 - 200
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
These issues are particularly important now (9/2/11) as Google pays off a $500 million forfeiture for promoting the sale of illegal drugs that drew a shareholder lawsuit (if for no other reason that the $500 million payment that kept irresponsible officers out of jail was made with the shareholders’ money), sends Eric Schmidt into a Senate meeting and is bracing for a raft of wrongful death, manslaughter or other charges that could come from grieving… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
I think the answer is likely to be no. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
The current Court majority has used its power to protect companies from big litigation. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:33 am
I use the word “potential” because the corporation can re-file itself and erase the personal liability. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Civil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- Excusable neglect -- In action for breach of contract, open account and unjust enrichment in which default had been entered for defendants' failure to file answer to original complaint, where trial court first granted defendants' motion for vacation of default judgment on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on forum selection clause, then upon plantiff's motion for rehearing determined it did have… [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Khuzami of the SEC answering questions about the relationship and the impact of said relationship between the two offices. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm
I started as a litigator at MoFo, and it was a total stroke of luck that I was able to go in-house and get trained by my boss on licensing. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm
Compare: In re Del Monte Foods Company Shareholder Litigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Shareholders Litigation was sent in by Alston & Bird Partner and Practice Center Contributor, Kevin Miller. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
" I do not pretend to know the answer. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
The answer was no, none, zero. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
If the SEC lifts its stay on its Rule 14a-8 amendments, shareholders will be able to submit access bylaw proposals in 2012 and Allen discusses the pros and cons of this. 2) The D&O Diary: Cornerstone Research Releases Mid-Year 2011 Securities Class Action Litigation Study – If you’re wondering what the latest trends in securities litigation are, Kevin LaCroix has the answers in his discussion of this study. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What is the end game in a world where we accept "incremental change" from corporations who answer only to shareholders? [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What is the end game in a world where we accept "incremental change" from corporations who answer only to shareholders? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
Now for lawyers care needs to be taken here as while there are certainly plenty of tasks that internal clients will pay for (doing deals, litigating etc), there are some jobs where the key beneficiaries may be the shareholders who won’t have a notional budget to cross-charge. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
All claims, disputes, demands or disagreements, relating to or arising out of, directly or indirectly, this Article II among the shareholders of the Corporation shall be settled by arbitration in Dallas, Texas. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The business divorce lawyer must be willing to take the lead in re-evaluating and advising the client of litigation and settlement prospects at every stage of the engagement. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:09 pm
Besides, this kind of litigation may also be the answer to the problem that plagued the FCIC: invite interested parties to litigate in court against the government, and suddenly we would have an inquiry commission of a whole different--and arguably, more effective--sort. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Litig. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
See In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 634 F.3d 187, 194, 199 (2d Cir. 2011) (stating that “Stolt-Nielsen states that parties cannot be forced to engage in a class arbitration absent a contractual agreement to do so. [read post]
