Search for: "In re Applied Materials, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
In re DV International, Inc., Serial No. 77501020 (September 29, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm by Maurice Bellan
On June 27, in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.,1 the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:57 pm by Bryan West
Lessons Learned If you’re complaining that you’ve been a victim of fraudulent behavior, plead fraud or prepare for monumental disappointment. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Accordingly, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the ADEA applies to all State and local political subdivisions. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:19 am by John L. Welch
In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., Serial No. 77590475 (March 28, 2013) [precedential].Section 2(e)(5) Functionality: In M-5 Steel Mfg. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:59 am
In In re Anpath Group, Inc., the TTAB rejected a pamphlet and a flyer as specimens of trademark use because they lack a sales form and ordering information that would enable the purchaser to place an order.In In re Shipley Co., the Board reversed a refusal of a specimen comprising a photo of a booth at a technical trade show because not only were sales materials available in the booth, but sales personnel were available to take orders.Here the coupon displays an… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:44 pm
" In a note, Hal Wegner identifies four Federal Circuit appeals up for review that may focus on obviousness: In re Applied Materials Israel Ltd., Fed. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:16 am by Dennis Crouch
In re: Cozy, Inc., No. 2023-145 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:38 am
Great Concepts, LLC, 119 U.S.P.Q.2d 1865, 1868 (T.T.A.B. 2016).Issue preclusion, or collateral estoppel, bars a party from re-litigating the same issue in a second action between the parties, B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]