Search for: "In re C. W."
Results 181 - 200
of 3,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
But most people think they’re consistent w/law. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
We’re all miserable. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Already we’re starting to see the details wearing away. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Reminds her of scenes a faire in ©; there are things we don’t protect b/c they’re ubiquitous, needed for expression. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:48 pm
The Court held: [W]e hold that, consistent with our holding in Wright [v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
C. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
We’d still have a workable/productive system, but w/fewer problems.Q: re: search. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Introduction of any diluting stimuli causes dilution w/r/t all marks; they didn’t notice this super-dilution result from surprise w/Mercedes toothpaste b/c they didn’t test for it. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:51 pm
Google and YT, both of which have prevailed in expensive litigation; obsession w/them distorts (c) law in general. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:23 pm
That case follows hot on the heels of Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 33. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:14 pm
If you’re interested in copyright issues - including from a comparative (U.S. and European) perspective - and are going to be in New York City on 1 February, then come along to Fordham Law School (150 W 62nd St) to participate in an evening of discussions kicking off at 18:00! [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
Need for fairness leads him to talk about proportionality; details of IP rights are important b/c they’re where we carry out the job of recognizing the property instinct and the need to limit it. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
B/c that affects whether consumers choose to interact w/it and the weight/credibility they give it. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Clarified and a regulation instead of a directive: That’s important b/c a directive is transposed into national law, w/27 potential different means. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
A common situation where a prior cause becomes an issue is the personal injury car accident, where the person re-injures an old injury. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
§ 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent…. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
They do their own screening of IP rights, and are generally cautious b/c they’re academic institutions. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
However, to keep the IRS from getting confused, you’ll need to check off the box at Part I on your Schedule C showing that you’re a statutory employee. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
A lot of times law pretends to talk about distinctiveness of but is really concerned with distinctivenss from.Jake Linford: What do we think we’re doing w/TM law? [read post]
