Search for: "In re I. W."
Results 181 - 200
of 7,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm
I Made The Paper Disappear! [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Rather than setting cases for re-argument, the Court 4-4'd cases including Friedrichs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
” Based on the materials I have reviewed, I agree that Prof. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:44 pm
The Trademark Solicitation Letter Let’s say you’re intrigued and want to check out the letter. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
W. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
The question presented in the case is "[w]hether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
In that posture, we're left with three statutes. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
Thanks, I guess(?) [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
While each trademark case is unique and must be decided on its own facts, the evidence here calls to mind our decision in In re Reach Electronics, Inc., 175 USPQ 734 (TTAB 1972) ("'REAC' and 'REACH' are literally words apart from each other. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
“I had a wonderful babysitter,” O’Connor told the co-authors of a book on career re-entry for women. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am
Raymond W. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
But when Congress has created a new right, a new duty, you know, the duty that exists under the Securities and Exchange Act, that is created by law, I thought Atlas Roofing was saying you’re not worried about stealing a common-law claim and putting it into a non-Article III tribunal. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
I am deighted to pass along the announcement of the publication of (Anne Wagner and Sarah Marusek (eds)) Research Handbook on Legal Semiotics (Edward Elgar, 2023). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
" Wehner is a former George W. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
… [W]here’s the proof that you’re doing that? [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:32 am
W. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
(They could potentially argue that they’re not bound by federal law because they’re Congress and make the law, etc.) [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
As expounded by the George W. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
As a practicing scientist and frequent peer reviewer, I can testify that Chubin’s view is correct. [read post]
