Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 181 - 200
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Oh, and if you’re interested in streamlining your practice, you might be interested in this. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:15 am
So, you now have your Will underway and your lawyer suggests that you also prepare documents for while you're still "above the ground", i.e. powers of attorney. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
. __ (2014), the United States Supreme Court addressed the role that the equitable defense of laches – i.e., a plaintiff’s unreasonable and prejudicial delay in commencing suit – plays in relation to a claim of copyright infringement filed within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:28 pm
Here in law library-land, we’re all familiar with the concept of “citation chasing”- i.e., finding one good on-point article and then mining its citations, footnotes, and citing sources for other relevant articles. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:42 am
Commercial landlords know that if a tenant fails to pay rent and the lease contains a forfeiture clause, the landlord can forfeit the lease by peaceable re entry i.e by changing the locks when the tenant is not in the premises. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Well, times have changed, because whether you know it or not, you’re very likely a player in the IP space…today’s world of ones and zeros (i.e. binary code, if you’re not up on the lingo). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
So… If you’re thinking of using Findlaw for your law firm website, you might want to do some serious due diligence (i.e. ask a bunch of fellow lawyers who’ve used them what their experiences have been). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
In other words, Playmedia was argiung that, assuming that the must carry rules applied, they could not be avoided by the broadcaster due to intellectual property concerns (i.e., lack of rights clearance). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
We’re patently fascinated by Patently–O’s recent debate as to whether subject matter eligibility under Section 101 of the Patent Act (i.e. whether the subject matter of a proposed invention is even susceptible to patent protection or not) is a proper defense in patent litigation, since the Patent Act seems to omit it from the list of validity defenses in Section 282. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:30 pm
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";Having watched the G20 "protests" with much interest (i.e. do these people really think a few thousand of them 'kicking up a fuss' is gonna make the slightest bit of difference to government policy then they're more retarded than they look) IP Freely noticed a piece on the IPKat to the effect that the G20 conference has reccomended a World IP Court.The idea is that the World Intellectual Property Litigation Court is to… [read post]
6 May 2010, 3:11 am
Commissioner Lynne Beresford will discuss various topics in the 9:35 to 11:05 time slot, including this one: "ensuring accurate descriptions of goods and services (i.e., minimizing deadwood), especially in the wake of the Federal Circuit decision in In re Bose Corp. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:21 am
It's all in the work--i.e., first rate legal products mixed with real client service for every client you serve--and the billing. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
In the wake of the HRC's campaign to pressure King & Spalding to drop its client (i.e., the House of Representatives), we're now seeing some public statements criticizing, expressly or implicitly, HRC's behavior. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 6:41 pm
Don’t admit to anything (i.e. drinking, driving or celebrating).Next, you’re ordered out of your vehicle and asked to perform a few police exercises, also known as field sobriety tests. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
The opposite is true for an “older” investor (i.e. someone who has saved up a significant nest egg). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:53 pm
Res. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:14 pm
" about how briefs need two types of factual statements, one substantive (about what happened in the real world, i.e., a "statement of facts") and one procedural (about what happened in court, i.e., a "statement of procedure"). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Swift Transportation and In re Swift Transportation) addressing arbitration appeals. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:43 am
Participants fill diverse stakeholder roles (data holder, data provider — i.e., research participant, re-identification researcher, privacy scholar, research ethicist) and will, I expect, have a range of perspectives on these questions: Misha Angrist Madeleine Ball Daniel Barth-Jones Yaniv Erlich Beau Gunderson Stephen Wilson Michelle Meyer Arvind Narayanan Paul Ohm Latanya Sweeney Jennifer Wagner I hope readers will join us on May 20. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:35 pm
So no matter what happens, you’re getting a second chance. [read post]
