Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 181 - 200 of 1,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
However, the initial declaration evidence did not provide an adequate accounting of diligence. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
On January 2, 2003 SCR Pharmatop filed a petition to revive the application, stating that the delay was “unintentional,” using the form provided by the PTO for revival requests. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:53 am by Danielle Citron
In August 2009, by transferring a capital prisoner’s original habeas petition to a federal district court rather than dismissing it outright, In re Davis abruptly thrust this obscure power back into mainstream legal debate over both the death penalty and the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:48 am by Jon Gelman
” N.J.S.A. 34:15–51The Court stated…… “Irrespective of the absence of express statutory authority and a one-year limitation imposed upon such a reopening in certain circumstances, N.J.S.A. 34:15–54, it is abundantly clear that the Division has the inherent power, “comparable to that possessed by the courts (R.R. 4:62–2 [now R. 4:50] ), to re-open judgments for fraud, mistake, inadvertence, or other equitable ground. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:36 am by Florian Mueller
Google's petition addresses only one of the two reasons for which the Federal Circuit agreed with OracleThe first subsection of the last section of Oracle's brief is short--merely two paragraphs--but raises an important issue:"Although one would never know it from Google's petition, the court of appeals found that Oracle's work is protected on two separate bases: (1) the original declaring code and (2) the packages' creative structure and… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
§ 205.1(a)(3)(i)(C)(2), an I-130 petition is automatically revoked upon the death of the petitioner, unless: USCIS determines, as a matter of discretion exercised for humanitarian reasons in light of the facts of a particular case, that it is inappropriate to revoke the approval of the petition. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
§ 205.1(a)(3)(i)(C)(2), an I-130 petition is automatically revoked upon the death of the petitioner, unless: USCIS determines, as a matter of discretion exercised for humanitarian reasons in light of the facts of a particular case, that it is inappropriate to revoke the approval of the petition. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Finally, if you’re a tax junkie or just a fan of George Harrison circa 1966, get ready to be excited. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
  That's expressly what the statute says.Which means that you're now in the second group of people who are permitted to file a petition for a finding of factual innocence. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:30 pm by Keith A. Davidson
  If a Trustee does not like the compensation provisions, then they can either (1) not agree to act as Trustee, or (2) have an interested party petition the Court and ask for additional compensation before acting. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Affirmed.NFP civil opinions today (4): In Re: The Estate of Patrick J. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The sponsor submitted a brief supporting the validity of the initiative petition. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Act, a petitioner may seek judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit of those portions of the petition which EPA denied. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:58 am by Steve Baird
Better yet, will the ineffective opposition (filed by the apparent principal of the prior registrant of STEEP) bar a future petition to cancel STEEP BY BIGELOW (to clear the path for re-registration of STEEP standing alone)? [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 12:38 pm
Since the Debtor was not domiciled in Florida or any State during the 180 days prior to filing of the petition, reference to Florida or any other State's opt-out is not initiated to not authorize the debtor to utilize the exemptions of Section 522(d) Federal Exemptions.The Arispe case was subsequently followed in In re Goldsmith, 2003 WL 295690 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla.) [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  There is some really interesting parts of the petition and case, but the petition largely re-argues the evidence — typically a losing approach at the Supreme Court. [read post]