Search for: "In re Interest of B.C."
Results 181 - 200
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 4:00 am
Heed was re-appointed to cabinet later that day, only to re-resign the next morning after the special prosecutor stepped down as a result of his law firm’s $1,000 contribution to the Heed campaign shortly before the last provincial election. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am
The 20 authorized dealers in B.C. are defendants in the action. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The program will focus on supporting emerging technologies that can supply power from B.C.'s diverse renewable resources. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The program will focus on supporting emerging technologies that can supply power from B.C.'s diverse renewable resources. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
In In re the Constitutional Question Act, R.S.B.C. 1986, C. 68, (BC Sup. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:07 am
-B.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm
If you're interested, feel free to email me at aparrish@swlaw.edu. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:17 am
If you are on Twitter and read or publish something that you think we should re-broadcast here, simply include the hash tag #slawca in the tweet or retweet. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 10:23 am
They're fast. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
B.C.'s Waste Management Act), pesticides, and climate change. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:15 pm
If you think this resembles a continuing education project, you’re exactly right. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 1:01 pm
Justice Ehrck, in Re: The Estate of Bessie Bloom, 2004 BCSC 70. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:43 pm
B.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
*************************The B.C. case is much more striking in terms of both parties having a similar, if not identical public interest. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
If you’re a lawyer with a conscience, that should bother you a great deal. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
British Columbia's Energy Plan: A Vision for Clean Energy Leadership hit a bit of a wall yesterday when it was rejected by the BC Utilities Commission as being "not in the public interest" - in other words, it's going to cost a lot of money and we're not interested. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:50 pm
They rejected the notion that the scope of one Charter right does not limit the scope of another right, pointing to para. 29 of the Re B.C. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:37 pm
They rejected the notion that the scope of one Charter right does not limit the scope of another right, pointing to para. 29 of the Re B.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 7:52 am
Are office supplies a special interest? [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:34 pm
Ground which can be abandoned but is hardto re-occupy is called entangling.5. [read post]
