Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 181 - 200
of 540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2021, 7:05 am
Greg Weiner (@GregWeiner1) ponders the broader implications of how the federal government re-imposed an eviction moratorium in this New York Times op-ed. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:05 am
His conduct from the bench has long been controversial, but he nonetheless ran for re-election unopposed in 2020. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 9:33 pm
In In re Application by Block (Minn. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Judges are generally suspicious when it appears legislators are trying to re-fight political battles in the courts, and usually conclude that legislators lack standing to challenge the actions of the executive branch (or that such suits present non-justiciable political questions). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:07 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:54 am
“When you have a Supreme Court case or something similar, they’re often extremely easy to get around. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:24 am
While we’re waiting for the courts to figure out what Hobby Lobby means for contraception coverage, the Supreme Court is already scheduled to revisit the underlying question of religious accommodation. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 2:03 pm
., In re Walgreen Co. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:56 am
We're in the business of discovering knowledge and then passing it, both newly learned and time-tested, to the next generation. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
We're also now a few days into June without opinions, and every day counts. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
H., 1949-Lawrence, Kan. : University Press of Kansas, c2010.Appellate Advocacy(RES) KF251 .B42 2010A practical guide to appellate advocacy / Mary Beth Beazley.Beazley, Mary Beth, 1957-Austin [Tex.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ; New York : Aspen Publishers, c2010.BankruptcyKF1524 .C4194 2010Chapter 7 consumer bankruptcy strategies : leading lawyers on preparing a chapter 7 filing, establishing effective client strategies, and understanding recent trends. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 2:54 pm
Here is an excerpt from the introduction: In Delegation and Time, Jonathan Adler and Chris Walker do an excellent job of introducing us to an important new way of thinking about broad congressional delegations of power. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:22 pm
(Reuters/Jonathan Ernst) King v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
In re Molasky, 843 F.3d 1179, 1184 n.5 (9th Cir. 2016). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:43 pm
And we’re the ones with the sense of vulnerability more befitting of children? [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
White, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Jonathan E. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 11:27 am
Re-reading the debate today reveals how much the debate has changed -- many more now support Epstein's position than did at the time and the focus has turned from "substantive due process" to the scope of the 14th Amendment's Privileges or Immunities clause -- and how much it has stayed the same -- there continues to be disagreement on the political Right over whether to urge judicial engagement or judicial restraint. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
Six of the unconfirmed nominations, however, involved individuals who subsequently were re-nominated and confirmed. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
While I believe the House’s arguments for standing are stronger than many commentators have acknowledged, I don’t think they’re strong enough, and some proponents of the suit have made bad arguments in defense of the House lawsuit. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:51 am
I just don’t know what else we’re going to do to try to figure out how to get some handle on this violence. [read post]
